Comparison

Why TrustedAIGov

Most teams reach for spreadsheets, a generic GRC tool, or a single AI-specific point tool. Here is how an end-to-end AI governance platform compares — across discovery, mapping, assurance, enforcement, cost and evidence.

vs the alternatives

How the categories stack up

An honest look at what each approach typically covers. ✓ supported · partial · — not supported.

Capability Spreadsheets Generic GRC tools AI-specific point tools TrustedAIGov
AI inventory & discoverypartialpartial
EU AI Act & ISO 42001 mappingpartial
Continuous assurancepartialpartial
Runtime enforcementpartial
AI cost (FinOps)
Audit-grade evidencepartialpartial
What makes it different

Three reasons teams choose us

Not another point tool — a single platform built for the way AI governance actually works.

🔗

End-to-end

One platform from assess to govern to assure to optimise — not a stitched-together stack.

  • Assess → govern
  • Govern → assure
  • Assure → optimise
⚙️

Runtime + records together

Enforcement at runtime and a system of record in one place, so evidence stays live.

  • Runtime enforcement
  • Live system of record
  • Evidence that stays current
⚖️

Built for the EU AI Act & ISO 42001

Designed around the obligations these frameworks set, not retrofitted onto generic GRC.

  • Designed for the EU AI Act
  • Aligned to ISO 42001
  • Obligations mapped to controls

See the difference for yourself

Start with where your AI exposure sits today, then see how one platform covers the whole picture.